SC tells Hadiya, husband cannot be guardian; heres more on what happened
Alleged victim of ‘love jehad’, Hadiya was told by Supreme Court that husband cannot be guardian.
A bench of Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices AM Khanwilkar and DY Chandrachud interacted with 25-year old Hadiya for nearly half-an-hour and posed questions on her life, ambition, studies and hobbies.
Hadiya told the Supreme Court that she wanted the ‘freedom’ to live with her husband, profess her faith in Islam and that she very well aware of what she was doing.
When the bench asked Hadiya to name any relative or any near acquaintance to be named as her local guardian in college at Salem in Tamil Nadu, she said her husband could be her guardian and she does not want anyone else in that role.
The bench posed questions to Hadiya in English while she answered in Malyalam, which was translated by senior advocate V Giri, who appeared for the Kerala government.
When the bench asked Hadiya what her dreams are for the future, she replied she wanted freedom and to live with her husband.
She further requested the Supreme Court that she be allowed to visit her friend before being taken to Salem, to which the court agreed and directed the state government to provide her security.
The court asked Kerala police to ensure that she travelled at the earliest to Salem in Tamil Nadu to pursue homeopathy studies at Sivaraj Medical College there and appointed dean of the institution as her local guardian.>